Chem 2310 Syllabus

Assessment Outcomes Data Report

CHEM 2310 – FALL 2006

 

Instructor:  Bradley Davidson 

Course  Description: Chemistry 2310, Organic Chemistry I – First of a Two-semester sequence, covering physical properties, nomenclature, mechanisms of reactions, and biological relavance of organic anc bioorganic molecules. 

Enrollment:  197

Assessment method: The following assessment strategies were incorporated into this course:

 

Outcomes Data:  The post-test questions are shown below.  They some questions are slightly altered from the pre-test questions.  Correct answers are marked with 4. 

 

2. Which statement in NOT true for an SN2 reaction? 

 

3. What is the product of the following reaction? 

 

                                      4 

 

5. What reaction sequence would accomplish this transformation? 

 

6. Which L-amino acid has the "R" configuration? 

7. Which structure is lowest in energy? 

                                                                                                                 4

 

The percentages of correct answers recorded for the pre- and post-tests are graphed below. 

 

Summary:  The pre-tests showed an almost random result, with most questions receiving near the 25%, which is, perhaps, not surprising for a technical subject.  The exception was question #2, which had two answers scored as correct, so the percentage correct was correspondingly higher.  Almost all questions showed the expected increase for the post-test.  The exception was question #1, which involved ranking the acid strength of organic molecules.  The inclusion of the ester (B), which had not been explicitely discussed in relation to acidity seemed to stump the class.  Acid-base concepts will continue to be stressed and reviewed throughout the course.  Question #10, which pertained to carbocation stability, exhibited the next lowest improvement for the post-test.  Students failed to recognize the contribution of resonance in the correct answer (D).  The implications of resonance to compound stability will be further emphasized.

      The course evaluations showed strong, but mixed opinions relating to the on-line quizes and homework sets, though sufficient positive comments suggest continuation, with some focusing of the questions used.  The use of Business 201 was poorly received due to dim lighting.  A change of room will be attempted, though lecture hall scheduling is difficult.  Finally, requests for additional out-of-class help support efforts to enlist a SI for problem sessions.